Table of Contents
An Oklahoma attorney walked into the state Bar Association headquarters carrying a stack of over 50 judicial complaints from citizens across the country, knowing full well the organization inside wants to strip away his law license. The irony wasn't lost on him as he approached the reception desk at 1901 North Lincoln Boulevard, the same address where judicial complaints are processed and where his professional fate hangs in the balance.
The complaints, gathered through his website, target what he describes as systemic corruption within Oklahoma's judicial system. Citizens from across multiple states have submitted forms detailing their experiences, creating a paper trail of allegations that now sits in the hands of the very institution trying to silence the messenger.
The Bar Association's Threat Campaign
The attorney revealed a troubling pattern of institutional protection that extends far beyond his own case. Four years ago, he filed complaints against three attorneys, Logan Jones, Eric Brown, and Matt Stacy, alleging they defrauded thousands of immigrants and Eastern Europeans through fake cannabis business ownership schemes. The bar association's response was swift and clear: they would not investigate.
Even after the attorneys were felony indicted for the alleged crimes, the bar association maintained their position. The three lawyers still hold active licenses and continue practicing, according to the attorney's claims. When he threatened to go public with the bar association's inaction, officials Gina Hendricks and Marine Fibo allegedly warned him in writing that discussing bar complaints publicly could result in disbarment proceedings.
A Pattern of Protecting Problem Lawyers
The complaints reveal a disturbing pattern of selective enforcement within Oklahoma's legal oversight system. The attorney cited the case of Arya Deb, who allegedly "raped and beat his wife" while the bar association took no disciplinary action. Deb eventually lost his license, but not for the serious criminal allegations. Instead, he was sanctioned for failing to pay bar dues and complete continuing legal education requirements.
This selective blindness extends to lawyers "threatening judges" and engaging in various forms of misconduct while maintaining their professional standing. The system appears designed to protect attorneys from consequences rather than safeguard the public they serve.
The Federal Court Gambit
Standing in the lobby of the Oklahoma Bar Center, the attorney expressed confidence that the bar association's retaliation against him for exercising free speech has created grounds for federal court intervention. The First Amendment implications of punishing an attorney for exposing judicial corruption could force a broader reckoning with how legal oversight operates in Oklahoma.
The pleasant reception from the front desk staff contrasted sharply with his previous encounters at courthouses, where he documented hostile reactions from officials. This time, the process was smooth, professional, and documented. Each complaint will receive an acknowledgment letter, creating an official record of the submissions.
What Happens Next Remains Unclear
As the attorney prepared to leave the bar association headquarters, he teased an upcoming video release showing an alleged assault by "this old man at the Craig County Courthouse." The footage promises to reveal another layer of the confrontations that have become routine in his campaign against judicial corruption.
The stack of complaints now sits somewhere in the building behind him, but whether they will receive serious investigation or join the growing pile of ignored allegations remains to be seen.
Watch the full video to see exactly how the bar association processed over 50 citizen complaints and what the attorney revealed about the federal strategy that could change everything.
