Table of Contents
A routine public meeting at the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs turned into a legal showdown when officials attempted to conduct government business while excluding dozens of citizens from the room. The confrontation, captured entirely on video, ended with officials canceling the meeting rather than face potential litigation for violating state open meetings laws.
What began as standard public comment period quickly escalated when the reporter discovered a fundamental problem with the proceedings.
The Lie That Started Everything
When the journalist asked whether people in the hallway could access the meeting, officials claimed everyone who wanted to attend was already in the room. "I don't think there's anybody in the hall anymore," one official stated confidently. "Everybody's in this room."
That statement proved to be completely false. As the exchange continued, it became clear that 30 to 40 people were waiting outside, unable to enter the public meeting that was already underway.
The reporter pressed the issue directly: "So you're conducting a public meeting without the public being allowed to access it?" Officials scrambled to justify their position, but the damage was done.
Confrontation Escalates Over Open Meetings Violation
As tensions mounted, the journalist didn't back down from the legal implications. "You're violating the ever living hell out of the open meetings act," he declared, demanding officials address the situation immediately.
The exchange grew heated when other attendees began arguing among themselves. Personal accusations flew, with one person telling another to "shut up" during public comments. The journalist intervened, defending citizens' right to speak: "You don't want the people in there, you want to continue operating illegally like you do already."
Officials called for their chief, clearly unprepared for the legal challenge they now faced.
The Stunning Admission of Inadequate Planning
Faced with mounting pressure and the threat of legal action, officials made a remarkable admission. They acknowledged the room was too small to accommodate the public interest in their meeting.
"We are going to have to reschedule the public meeting because we don't have enough room to accommodate everybody," an official finally conceded.
But the problems ran deeper than just space. When attendees asked who from the agency leadership was actually present to hear their concerns, another damaging revelation emerged.
No Decision Makers Present
The meeting's fundamental flaws extended beyond the space issue. Citizens discovered that none of the agency's decision makers were in attendance to hear public comments.
"There's no director, there's nobody from OBNDD in this room of any power," one attendee pointed out. "Nobody of any influence or power in this room."
This admission rendered the entire proceeding essentially meaningless, even if the space and access issues had been resolved. Citizens had taken time from their businesses and farms to attend, only to discover their voices wouldn't reach anyone with authority to act on their concerns.
Meeting Collapses Under Legal Pressure
The combination of open meetings violations, inadequate facilities, and absent leadership proved too much for officials to overcome. They announced the meeting would be rescheduled for a larger venue, though questions remained about comment deadlines and whether decision makers would actually attend the rescheduled session.
The video captures the dramatic moment when officials realized they had no choice but to cancel rather than continue operating in violation of state law. But the most revealing exchanges happen in the aftermath, when the true scope of their deception becomes clear.
Watch the complete confrontation unfold and see exactly how officials responded when their violations were exposed on camera.
