> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://guerrilla.news/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# 7 Armed Deputies and an Assistant DA Confront One Petitioner in Claremore
- URL: https://guerrilla.news/7-armed-deputies-and-an-assistant-da-confront-one-petitioner-in-claremore/
- Published: 2026-05-20T16:00:18.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-01T03:27:34.000Z
- Description: Rogers County sent an assistant DA and seven armed deputies to stop one man collecting recall signatures at the courthouse. He demanded a law. They never found one. The footage shows why.
- Author: Ronald E. Durbin II, J.D.
- Tags: #channel-UC_2FGy-X1_bPWd-qtSqUpIQ, Guerrilla News, Police Accountability, First Amendment, Government Transparency, Open Records, Oklahoma, Project Mustang, Rogers County

He was standing quietly in a courthouse hallway with a clipboard, trying to gather signatures for a recall petition against Claremore's city council. Within minutes, an assistant district attorney and seven Rogers County deputies surrounded him. No one could tell him which law he had broken. What happened over the next twenty minutes was caught entirely on camera, and it is not what you would expect.

This wasn't a routine disagreement about courthouse rules. This was the moment a years-long fight over a secretive data center deal, closed-door meetings, and a billion-dollar tech company's request for taxpayer money finally boiled over in front of witnesses and body cameras. And the people sent to shut it down may have made things dramatically worse for themselves.

## Seven Guns for One Man With a Clipboard

Watch the footage and count them yourself: seven armed deputies, standing shoulder to shoulder, dispatched to confront a man doing nothing more than asking strangers to sign a piece of paper in a public hallway. He wasn't blocking anyone. He wasn't shouting. He was, by his own account and by the silence of the deputies when asked directly, not disturbing a single person in that building.

So why seven? That question gets asked more than once in the video, and the answers given on camera do not hold up well under repetition.

## "Cite Me a Law." Nobody Could.

The assistant district attorney, later identified on camera as Todd Wagner, tried to invoke "reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions," then pivoted to calling the courthouse a "limited public forum," then invoked the First Amendment itself as if it were a statute banning signature collection. Each time, he was asked the same simple question: show me the resolution, the ordinance, or the case law that says this is illegal.

He never produced one. What he said instead, as the pressure mounted and the cameras kept rolling, is something you need to hear in his own words to fully understand. It is not something a paraphrase can do justice to.

## The Detail Nobody Expected

Partway through the confrontation, something happens that has nothing to do with legal theory and everything to do with how badly this went for the people sent to enforce it. It becomes a running joke among the citizens on scene, referenced again and again for the rest of the video, and once you see it you will understand exactly why they couldn't let it go.

It is the kind of moment that turns a tense standoff into something almost impossible to watch without reacting out loud.

## A County Commissioner Compares Petitioners to the KKK

Later, the group tracks down County Commissioner Lane Brown, the man allegedly behind the order to clear the hallway. He admits, on camera, that there is no written policy prohibiting signature collection in the courthouse. None. Just an unwritten "standard" he says protects the building from unwanted messaging.

Then he explains who that unwritten rule is really meant to stop, invoking a comparison so charged that the room goes quiet. The legal problem with what he says next is bigger than he seems to realize, and it is spelled out in detail in the footage.

## An NDA Question That Got Deflected, Not Denied

While records requests are being filed, a pointed question gets asked of a county employee: did you sign a non-disclosure agreement with Beal Infrastructure over the data center project known as Project Mustang? The answer isn't a firm no. It's something closer to "I don't recall," delivered by someone who moments later refuses to answer anything else at all.

Whether that hesitation means anything, and what the paper trail behind Project Mustang actually shows, is a thread this video pulls on but does not fully resolve. That's where the real story is headed next.

The confrontation ends with a threat of legal action, a warning that background checks are coming for everyone involved, and a promise that this "isn't over." Whether that promise gets kept, and what happens when the lawsuits and open records requests start landing on desks in Rogers County, is not something you'll find in a summary.

*If you believe public buildings belong to the public, watch the full confrontation and see for yourself who backed down first.*